Harry Potter Movies: From Worst to Best

Carl Eden
Latest posts by Carl Eden (see all)

I was unfortunate enough to get pretty sick over the Christmas period, and in the height of my feverish and sloppy state, spent two days dazed in bed, with nothing but my sister’s complete Harry Potter boxset for company.

There’s something comforting about Harry Potter – with all of its British charm and whimsical magic – which makes for easy viewing; these are the sort of films you could watch when sick, on a hangover, or on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Whilst I’d never consider myself a die-hard fan (I loved the books as a child/early-teen, but so did almost everyone else of my age bracket in the world) there is something impressive about a seven-book-long series adapted, with a consistent cast and crew, into eight unique movies.

As such, it seemed fitting to rank the Harry Potter movie series, from worst to best. I’ll be looking into adaptation, the cast and the directing, and highlighting the franchise’s strongest and weakest moments.

8: Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone


The first film of the series, and easily the worst. The film works like a photocopier – it transfers JK Rowling’s original tale onto screen almost page by page, but fails to capture the novel’s sense of world building, wonder and magic. It’s an awful adaptation, rendered worse by the fact that Stone had to cover all of the series’ exposition and character-introducing, which leads to a slim 200-page children’s book being turned into a 152-minute-long endurance test.

Kids loved Harry Potter at the time, but it’s hard to imagine many 10 year-olds sitting comfortably through this. Columbus is a bland director and fails to give the movie any sense of artistic character – this is a completely by the numbers children’s blockbuster with weak cinematography (compare Hogwarts here to it post Prisoner of Azkaban) and dodgy effects, though it does boast an iconic score by John Williams. It seems likely that Warner Bros, afraid to step on the toes of any (money spending) young viewers, encouraged Columbus to straight-up copy the book’s content without letting any potentially audience dividing creativity get in the way. As such, this is the franchise at its dullest – skip this one if it’s on TV.

RELATED ARTICLE  Harry Potter and the Cursed Child published this summer!

7. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets


The Chris Columbus movies are by far the weakest in the series, and whilst Chamber of Secrets is an improvement on the first film, there’s still a long way to go at this point. The problems attached to the original movie apply to this one; it’s simply too long, with the screenplay desperate to accommodate every word of the book without making any effort to do something interesting.

Chamber is the longest film in the series, based on the second shortest book, which says a lot. Watching the movie is a lot like reading a Wikipedia summary of the story; there’s no heart, which is a shame, because in the right hands Chamber could have been amazing. It features a fantastic creature-focused mystery which a better director could have worked wonders with, and though the final scenes with the basilisk are good and the stakes higher throughout, this is simply too cumbersome to really be engaging.

6. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince


JK Rowling loved this one, and whilst it’s a considerably better movie than some of the others in the series, it suffers from the weakness of the source material. As with all long-running franchises on their way to climax, there’s inevitably got to be a moment towards the end where the story stops for breath; The Half Blood Prince is one of the least interesting books in the series for that reason – very little happens and the story treads water.

It says a lot that extra scenes – the destruction of the Millennium bridge, the Deatheater attack – are added in to pad out the action. On top of this, certain key moments, such as Dumbledore’s funeral, are removed, and the movie seems to lack a resolution. It can’t really stand on its own terms; it’s easier to get away with this in a book series, which can run on at its own pace, but a film needs more of a beginning-middle-end structure to function.

The romance elements feel tacked on, but then they did in the book too. On the plus side, the cinematography is beautiful, there’s a great sense of dread, and some of the best acting in the series – Daniel Radcliffe gets to show off his comedic side which is always nice. Yates is comfortable with the material, it’s just with this one, there’s not a great deal to work with.

5. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2


The final in the series, and not bad at all. There are some fantastic moments – the opening sequence in the bank with the dragon is great, and the final battle of Hogwarts is as big and impressive as you’d expect. All of the cast are on top form and there’s a certain sadness from seeing these characters for the last time, having watched them grow up on screen. Ralph Fiennes as ever is a wonderfully wispy and snake-like Voldemort, and Alan Rickman gets his best moment as Snape. That said, the tacked on epilogue adds nothing – it was awful in the book too and you get the feeling Rowling only put it there to cancel out any potential sequels. There’s a lot of good-will towards this one; it leaves the audience feeling stirred up, which is what it’s meant to do, but in terms of story, this is one of the weakest entries in the series, and it really only gets the praise it does because it’s the finale. There are better and more complete movies in the series.

RELATED ARTICLE  Opinion: Hogwarts Legacy – to buy or not to buy?

4. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire


Mike Newell’s fourth film, Goblet of Fire, impressively manages to condense a very large book into a single movie. This partly works very well – the Tri-Wizard Tournament allows the film to be broken down into a series of manageable set-pieces (dragon, lake, ball, maze) all of which are handled very well. The problem with the adaptation however is that in condensing such a large book, the pacing becomes dreadful, meaning certain elements are padded out far too much (the ball – it’s nice to see these characters growing up, but this drags) whilst others – the opening, and mainly the climax, are left lacking.

It says a lot that the wand-related Deus-Ex-Machina isn’t even explained, and for non-book fans, parts of this ending must be incomprehensible. That said, the cinematography and world-design here is top-notch, the movie feels bigger and darker than what’s come before, and the action is good. Fiennes makes his first and best appearance as Voldermort, Michael Gambon gets to loosen up Dumbledore and the young cast, finally growing up, are actually starting to flex their acting chops here.

3. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix


David Yates’ first shot at directing the series, a role he’d keep for the rest of the run. Yates gets this material and Order is perhaps the most confident film in the franchise. It’s a transitional plot, one which opens the series up from small, who-done-it mysteries into all out battle of good versus evil, and Yates does a great job adapting these changes. The opening scenes with the Dementors are stunning to look at – Order being so visually far removed from the drab Columbus days, and there’s some wonderful set-design throughout; the Ministry of Magic in its ebony glory is particularly striking. Daniel Radcliffe really grows into the role here, we get the Dumbledore/Voldemort battle we’ve been waiting years for, a lot more Gary Oldman (always a plus) and Imelda Staunton’s Dolores Umbridge, a brilliant passive aggressive villain and one Stephen King (based on his villains in The Mist and Misery) would have been proud of.

RELATED ARTICLE  Emma Watson to voice Belle in Beauty and the Beast

2. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1

Perhaps the most surprising entry on this list, Part 1 should have been terrible; it’s based on half a book, and a weak half at that. The film, however, is actually an improvement on the material – it’s a very tense movie, with a great sense of hopeless dread and escalating chaos, and by this point, it really feels like all bets are off. The movie does a lot with its meagre plot; the infiltration of the Ministry of Magic is both funny and tense, the scenes at Godric’s Hollow haunting and scary, and the scenes of Harry, Hermione and Ron wandering the woods are good – mainly because of the young cast.

Watson and Grint give their best performances in the series here. Part 1 is a much stronger movie than Part 2, which is surprising. And with its sweeping shots of various UK hills and mountains, the film possesses the most beautiful cinematography of the series. The animated story of the Deathly Hallows is unexpected and striking, a bold and impressive move this late in the game.

1. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban


This one has a lot going for it, mainly because of its director Alfonso Cuarón, one of the best directors working today. Cuarón breathes new life into the series after the tired and half-arsed Columbus films, and everything is improved; Hogwarts is completely redesigned, as are the sets, costumes, style – which makes the film feel more organic and natural than what came before.

The remaining Harry Potter movies are completely shaped by this one; its influence is important to the cinematography of all the future films. It’s helped that Cuarón gets the sense of magic which comes with the books and translates that wonderful atmosphere into his movie. Prisoner isn’t afraid to stray from the source, so never feels as creatively dead as the Columbus movies, and has the benefit of a stand-alone and complex mystery plot with some clever time travel elements. Of all the movies, this is the only one which really functions with its own narrative, and it’s by far the best movie in the series. When critics look back on Harry Potter in years to come, this will be the one they remember.

That’s all! A run down and ranking of all the Harry Potter movies. Feel free to let me know below if you agree or disagree.

About Carl Eden

An English Lit graduate with a love of movies and words, currently living and working in Manchester. I'm an aspiring 20-something film journalist far too involved in pop culture. Big on TV, books, coffee-abuse, The Smiths, Buffy, David Lynch and I consume a lot of Haribo. Follow @cedenuk or check out my blog http://somefilmsandstuff.com/